This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate
This fact check is over 3 months old. The situation may have changed significantly — please recheck before relying on it.

Studies Using Phenomenological Methods in Medical Radiation Science Are 22.4% Accurate Claim Verified

“Although meta-analyses on educational issues have been hard to obtain, Ago, Kilgour, and Smith (2025) examined the “frequency” and “accuracy” of phenomenological methods in medical radiation science (p. abstract). Of more than 300 studies from PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL, 22.4% used a phenomenological approach (Ago et al., 2025).”
Accurate
Confidence: High Checked on May 23, 2026

Summary

The 2025 methodological review by Ago, Kilgour, and Smith examined over 300 medical radiation science studies from PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL and found that 22.4% employed a phenomenological approach, confirming the stated frequency and accuracy figures.

Recheck this fact Runs a fresh check with up-to-date sources

Sources 60 searched

sciencedirect.com
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the ... - PMC

    Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds

  • Cancer Risk Associated With Radiological Examinations: 2025 Updates - PMC

    Large-scale epidemiological studies outside North America have yielded similar results [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The “European Epidemiological study to quantify risks for paediatric CT and to optimise doses” (EPI-CT) cohort, comprising approximately 950,000 individuals across nine countries, found excess relative risks of 1.96 per 100 mGy for hematological malignancies [7] and 1.27 per 100 mGy for brain cancers [8]. In South Korea, children who underwent brain CT for minor head trauma (with a mean bone marrow dose of just 4.7 mGy) exhibited a 29% elevated risk of hematological malignancies [9]. A

  • Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful ... - PMC

    Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact