Article 32 gives legal remedy for rights violations in India
Question asked:
“Article 32 of the Constitution of India provides a legal remedy when Fundamental Rights are violated.”
Summary
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to constitutional remedies, allowing individuals to approach the Supreme Court (and High Courts) to enforce their Fundamental Rights when they are violated. This provision is a core component of the Constitution’s guarantee of legal redress for such violations.
Sources 59 searched
- Article 32 in Constitution of India
(4)The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.Editorial Comment - Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is a fundamental right that guarantees the right to constitutional remedies.
- Article 32: Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part - Constitution of India
Article 32 gives citizens the right to approach the Supreme Court for constitutional remedies when their fundamental rights are violated.
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32 of Indian Constitution) UPSC CSE
Only Fundamental Rights, and not any other rights, can be enforced under Article 32. Supreme Court’s Views On Right to Constitutional Remedies · The Supreme Court has declared that Article 32 of Indian Constitution is a basic feature of the ...
- Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32): Meaning, Provisions - UPSC CSE
The Right to Constitutional Remedies, enshrined in Article 32 of Indian Constitution, is a fundamental right that empowers individuals to seek legal remedies from the Supreme Court and High Courts for the enforcement of their fundamental rights.
- Article 32 of Indian Constitution, Right to Constitutional Remedies
Article 32 of Indian Constitution guarantees the right to constitutional remedies, allowing citizens to approach the Supreme Court to enforce Fundamental Rights.
- Article 32: Right to Constitutional Remedies
Article 32 provides every Indian citizen with the right to seek constitutional remedy from the Supreme Court if they have been deprived of their fundamental rights (FRs).
- Right To Constitutional Remedies (Article 32) Explained
Critics argue this ruling discourages citizens from filing legitimate PILs out of fear they will be perceived as “frivolous.” There are also concerns the government may use this ruling to crack down on PILs that expose government wrongdoing ...
- Constitutional Remedies – Constitutional Law and Philosophy
T.N. Godavarman Thirumulkpad v Union of India (1996) (¶4-5). Though my argument is not merely to point this confusion out, but rather, to emphasise the flaw in the Hon’ble Chief Justice’s reasoning. This is because in not entering the ‘legislative domain’ or providing any ‘judicial remedy’ at all, the court did not even perform its constitutionally mandated judicial duty under Article 32.
- 1 International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review www.lawjournals.net
Article 32 can only be invoked to · get redress for basic rights established in Articles 12- 35. It does not exist for any other legal right for which many laws are · available. Right to Constitutional Remedy is the most important right of the Indian Constitution.