This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate
This fact check is over 3 months old. The situation may have changed significantly — please recheck before relying on it.

Check Some More Fact Check Verdict Not Applicable

“check some more”
Not applicable
Confidence: High Checked on May 28, 2026

Summary

“Check some more” is a request to continue verifying or examining information, not a factual statement that can be true or false. Consequently, there is nothing to fact‑check about the phrase itself.

Recheck this fact Runs a fresh check with up-to-date sources

Sources 58 searched

nature.com
cnn.com
  • Fact check: Debunking 100 Trump false claims from his first 100 days | CNN Politics

    Falsely claimed the EU has a trade barrier that makes it impossible to sell US cars there – a test in which “they drop a bowling ball on the top of your car from 20 feet up in the air, and if there’s a little dent, they say, ‘No, I’m sorry, your car doesn’t qualify.’” There is no EU car safety test involving bowling balls and no requirement for cars to not experience even minor damage when a large object strikes them. 55. Falsely claimed the EU was “formed for the purpose of taking advantage of the United States.” Experts on the history of the EU have told CNN such claims are “preposterous” and “could not be more wrong or inaccurate,” noting US presidents consistently supported European integration efforts that were intended to stabilize the continent and promote prosperity.

nytimes.com
languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu
  • Language Log » NYT word frequency data

    As I argued, the 0-1 scaling leads to the implication that (say) discussions of "church" and "duties" have been replaced by discussions of things like "toxic masculinity", which is misleading since there's two orders of magnitude difference in their relative frequency. One more request: can you tell us how you got the list of article URLs by year that you present in your csv files? Did you scrape the whole NYT archive, or get the data from somewhere else?

larryferlazzo.edublogs.org
dictionary.cambridge.org
bookdown.org
  • 11 Term Frequencies | A Short Guide to Historical Newspaper Data, Using R

    Doing this with newspaper data can be particularly significant, because it’s quite easy to discover trends, reporting practices, and particular events. By count words, and sorting by date, or by title, it’s possible to make some interesting comparisons and conclusions in the makeup of different titles, or to understand changes in reporting over time.

merriam-webster.com

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact