US Global Military Base Plan to Prevent Future Threats Debunked
“Did the United States have a plan to make sure no country will ever be able to threaten them again. And because of that they started to build / get military bases all around the world”
Summary
Historical U.S. policies such as the Monroe Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and various security strategies address regional influence and post‑war recovery, but none constitute a documented plan to guarantee that no nation could ever threaten the United States. Likewise, while the United States maintains overseas military bases, the sources do not link them to a singular, all‑encompassing plan to eliminate all future threats.
Sources 60 searched
- Monroe Doctrine (1823) | National Archives
While the Monroe Doctrine’s message was designed to keep European powers out of the Western Hemisphere, Roosevelt would strengthen its meaning to justify sending the United States into other countries of the Western Hemisphere.
- Marshall Plan (1948) | National Archives
Any assistance that this Government may render in the future should provide a cure rather than a mere palliative. Any government that is willing to assist in the task of recovery will find full cooperation, I am sure, on the part of the United States Government. Any government which maneuvers to block the recovery of other countries cannot expect help from us.
- Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations - Office of the Historian
Earlier in 1823 British Foreign Minister George Canning suggested to Americans that two nations issue a joint declaration to deter any other power from intervening in Central and South America. Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, however, vigorously opposed cooperation with Great Britain, ...
- Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations - Office of the Historian
The Japanese invasion of Manchuria and subsequent push to gain control over larger expanses of Northeast China in 1931 led President Herbert Hoover and his Secretary of State, Henry Stimson, to establish the Stimson Doctrine, which stated that the United States would not recognize the territory ...
- United States Department of State
Complaints regarding censorship of people in various countries has been added in that had not been dealt with before. So I’m not going to speak on the decisions that our diplomats have made in looking at the nature of the – of the data that they’re receiving. But I can tell you that the nature of the attitude, the reason for the report, hasn’t changed. It is to make sure people know what’s happening around the world, what our posture is toward that.
- The National Security Strategy of the United States of America
The great struggles of the twentieth century between liberty and totalitarianism ended with a decisive victory for the forces of freedomand a single sustainable model for national success: freedom, democracy, and free enterprise. In the twenty-first century, only nations that share a commitment ...
- Guaranteeing The States Protection Against Invasion – The White House
Due to significant information ... times, Federal officials do not have the ability to verify with certainty the criminal record or national-security risks associated with the illegal entry of every alien at the southern border, as required ...
- Restricting and Limiting the Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the Security of the United States – The White House
In order to protect our Nation, ... Accordingly, in Proclamation 10949, I restricted the entry of foreign nationals into the United States from countries with deficient screening and vetting information to protect the national ...
- 1 U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary
country is recalcitrant (as defined by Congress) the State Department should be required to impose an · escalating series of visa sanctions for recalcitrant countries, and also be required to withhold certain forms ... networks, access to electronic money transfers to foreign countries should be limited to those providing · evidence of U.S.