This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate

Hi Gemma, I like how your questions move from students’ e...

“Hi Gemma, I like how your questions move from students’ experiences to impact, reporting, support and possible change. I wondered whether Questions 2–4 need a skip instruction because they assume an incident occurred. Questions 2 and 4 also combine two issues—campus and online study, and support from the institution and others. Neuman (2014, pp. 322–325) cautions against false premises and double-barrelled questions, so separating these would make the questions clearer. **Reference** Neuman, W. L. (2014). *Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches* (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.”
Factually correct
Confidence: High Checked on August 25, 2026

Summary

Skip instructions are essential when survey items assume a prior incident, and best practice literature emphasizes providing clear skip logic to avoid respondent confusion. Combining separate issues in a single question creates a double‑barreled item, which is widely recognized as reducing data quality; separating them improves clarity and reliability. The statement aligns with current survey design guidance.

Sources 60 searched

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
research.library.gsu.edu
surveypractice.org
arxiv.org
  • arXiv:0803.3875v1 [stat.AP] 27 Mar 2008 The Annals of Applied Statistics

    This paper has formally analyzed skip sequencing as a decision problem · in questionnaire design. We have intentionally kept the exposition simple · in order to highlight the basic trade-offbetween cost and informativeness · in choosing a design option. Survey researchers and statisticians ...

marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz
qualtrics.com
kantar.com
cultureamp.com

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact