Hentai Girl Age Classification by Law: Jurisdiction Guide

to difficult legal problems.” Oregon v. Ice, 555 U.S. ... Court concluded that H.B. 1181 was faulty because it · “leav[es] minors able to access any pornography as

Please help us improve our site! ... (a) In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that— ... depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and

Many states have laws that prohibit disseminating to children material that is “harmful to minors.” For material to fall into this category, the same three-part test for obscenity applies, but with the gloss that a jury (or judge) must determine whether the material appeals primarily to a prurient interest in sex for minors and whether it lacks serious merit for minors. For that reason, this area of the law is known as “variable obscenity.” · As with adult obscenity, the work must be evaluated as a whole.

Since a reform of the French penal code, introduced in 2013, producing or distributing drawings that represent a minor aged less than 15 years old is considered the same as producing real child pornography and is punishable by up to five years' imprisonment and a €75,000 fine, even if the ...

In the Australian state of Victoria, it is illegal to publish imagery that "describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a minor engaging in sexual activity or depicted in an indecent sexual manner or context". The hentai subgenres known as lolicon and shotacon have been the subject ...

Differences include the definition of "child" under the laws, which can vary with the age of sexual consent; the definition of "child pornography" itself, for example on the basis of medium or degree of reality; and which actions are criminal (e.g., production, distribution, possession, downloading or viewing of material). Laws surrounding fictional child pornography are a major source of variation between jurisdictions; some maintain distinctions in legality between real and fictive pornography depicting minors, while others regulate fictive material under general laws against child pornography.

The court held that the government did not demonstrate a compelling justification for “regulating sexually explicit materials that do not contain visual images of actual children.” According to the court, the act impermissibly criminalizes “the use of fictional images that involve no human being, whether that person is over the statutory age and looks younger, or indeed, a fictional person under the prohibited age.” ... Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA) in 1996. The CPPA expands upon existing laws to combat the use of computer technology to produce pornography containing images that appear to be children. It marked a change in the criminal regulatory scheme, shifting the law enforcement focus toward the illegality of any “visual depiction” that “is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct.”

One relevant US law is Title 18 Chapter 110. Using real children in porn is against the law, as is most anything connected to it (permitting children to do it, distributing, buying...). Under the definitions (18 USC 2256(1)) “minor” means any person under the age of eighteen years.