Can I Ask Fact Not Possibility Verdict Explained
“I ask fact, not possibility”
Summary
The claim “I ask fact, not possibility” is a personal statement of intent rather than an objective assertion that can be confirmed or refuted with evidence. As such, it cannot be classified as a factual claim and therefore is not subject to verification.
Sources 60 searched
- The intentions of information sources can affect what information people think qualifies as true | Scientific Reports
Moreover, it can shed light on how people react to intentionally misleading information, a particularly important topic given that information that is not completely false can still be misleading, and possibly even more convincing than complete falsehoods15,31. To investigate if attributions of intent affect whether people think a claim qualifies as true or false, we ran a series of experiments in which participants were shown claims of fact alongside the ground truth relevant to those claims.
- Camus: The Myth of Sisyphus 1
profound, for example, than Kierkegaard' s view according to which despair is not a fact but a state: the · very state of sin. For sin is what alienates from God. The absurd, which is the metaphysical state of the · conscious man, does not lead to God.7 Perhaps this notion will become clearer if I risk this shocking ... It is a matter of living in that state of the absurd. I know on what it is founded, this mind and this · world straining against each other without being able to em- brace each other. I ask for the rule of life
- Can You Believe It? Seven Questions to Ask About Any Scientific Claim | Exploratorium
Uncontrolled variables can play evil tricks on data, too; these are factors that influence results but haven’t been taken into account, possibly because no one even knows about them. So ask yourself: What methods were used to collect the evidence for this claim? Are the methods even explained? Be warned that even methods that seem reasonable may rest on false assumptions.
- Misattribution (when someone claims you said something that you’ve never said)–it’s kind of like plagiarism in reverse. | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
But it’s possible that the speaker meant “Lies (damn lies!) and statistics” which has a very different meaning. ... There is a term in Australian English, “to verbal ” derived from the dubious practice of NSW policing to claim that a suspect had given a verbal confession when they had not, in fact, done so. It now extends to a general practice of claiming, falsely, that someone had expressed a view or fact.
- Fact - Wikiquote
Facts have to be discovered by observation, not by reasoning. Bertrand Russell (1945) A History of Western Philosophy Book Three, Part I, Chapter X, Spinoza, p. 577 · When you are studying any matter, or considering any philosophy, ask yourself only: What are the facts, and what is the truth that the facts bear out.
- The Project Gutenberg E-text of The Will to Believe, by William James
He who takes for his hypothesis the notion that it is the permanent form of the world is what I call a radical empiricist. For him the crudity of experience remains an eternal element thereof. There is no possible point of view from which the world can appear an absolutely single fact.
- Suggestive question - Wikipedia
A suggestive question is a question that implies that a certain answer should be given in response, or falsely presents a presupposition in the question as accepted fact. Such a question distorts the memory thereby tricking the person into answering in a specific way that might or might not ...
- Rhetorical question - Wikipedia
In the vernacular, this form of rhetorical question is called "rhetorical affirmation". The certainty or obviousness of the answer to a question is expressed by asking another, often humorous, question for which the answer is equally obvious.
- Can, could or may ? - Grammar - Cambridge Dictionary
We use can, could and may to ask for permission. We use can and may, but not could, to give permission.