46 IPCC Researchers Did Not Resign Over Climate Report
“is it true that 46 researchers from the ipcc resigned”
Summary
No, 46 IPCC researchers have not resigned. Fact‑checks confirm that the alleged list is over a decade old and there has been no wave of resignations reported by the IPCC or any authoritative source. The organization states it is unaware of any such departures.
Sources 59 searched
- Critical misalignments in climate pledges reveal imbalanced sustainable development pathways | Nature Communications
As six years are left to achieve the 2030 Agenda and the “safe operating space for humanity”46 is rapidly closing due to anthropogenic factors, systemic approaches, and ambitious pledges are urgently needed.
- Federal Register :: Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Program Project: Cancer Research.
- Falschbehauptung über angeblichen IPCC-Austritt von 46 Forschenden kursierte erneut online | Faktencheck
Doch bis zur Veröffentlichung dieses Faktenchecks hat es keine solche Rücktrittswelle beim IPCC gegeben. Die Liste mit Zitaten von 46 Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern wurde vor über einem Jahrzehnt online veröffentlicht und sollte ...
- Climate consensus remains despite revisions to far-end emission scenarios | Fact Check
"The IPCC does not conduct its own research, run models or make measurements," it said. The seventh assessment cycle currently involves 664 scientists from 111 countries (archived here and here). AFP has debunked a series of myths and misconceptions about climate science.
- Warum das Worst-Case-Szenario vom Weltklimarat angepasst wurde | tagesschau.de
Das deutsche Koordinationsbüro des IPCC sagt zu diesen Vorwürfen auf Nachfrage: "Uns ist kein Rücktritt von IPCC-Autorinnen oder -Autoren in diesem Zusammenhang bekannt." Falls sich die Zahl 46 auf einen Beitrag auf der Online-Seite "The ...
- Scientists Ditched a Scary Climate Scenario. What Now? - The New York Times
While global warming is still a threat, the decision to back away from a worst-case outlook raises questions about whether some risks have been overstated.
- BBC Audio | More or Less | RCP 8.5: Why did the climate change model get it wrong?
Dr Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist and the climate research lead at Stripe, explains the argument.
- Media Coverage (or Not) of RCP8.5 RIP | AEI
Neither Science nor Nature has covered the retirement of the extreme scenarios. So far in 2026, more than 2,600 studies have been published using the high-end scenarios and tens of thousands before that — so this is a really big story within ...
- A Scientific Method of Resisting - Union of Concerned Scientists
Science has been a testing ground. If you can make people doubt peer-reviewed research, vaccines, and climate data, you can make them doubt anything.
This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.
