This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate
This fact check is over 4 months old. The situation may have changed significantly — please recheck before relying on it.

Canadas Bill C-11, C-8, and C-9: Separating Fact from Fiction

“Is it true that: Bill C-11: A bill promoting more Canadian media and effects what content is shared. Although promoting Canadian media as a way of preserving culture is effective. It also is effective in preventing from seeing multiple different perspectives around the world. Bill C-8: Allows businesses to shut down internet services with permission if a cyber attack happens. This could silence Canadian media and news networks outlets in seconds, causing inaccessibility to news outlets limiting freedom of speech. Bill C-9: Changes the definition of hate as feelings of “Vilification and detestation” to crack down on hate. Although it can criminalize peaceful demonstrations viewed as hate on another side and lead to be silenced without any proper or clear justification. The new definition of hate is now quite broad which can lead to these issues.”
Mostly false
Confidence: High Checked on April 12, 2026

Summary

Bill C‑11 aims to increase Canadian content on streaming platforms but does not broadly regulate internet content or block access to worldwide perspectives, contrary to the claim. Bill C‑8 amends the Telecommunications Act to enhance security and permits government orders for protective actions, not to let businesses shut down internet services and silence media. There is no current evidence that Bill C‑9 has redefined hate in the way described.

Recheck this fact Runs a fresh check with up-to-date sources

Sources 80 searched

en.wikipedia.org
  • Online Streaming Act - Wikipedia

    Upon the announcement of the expenditure requirements, Barry Hertz of The Globe and Mail noted that the requirement to contribute revenue to local news was a "puzzling spillover of the Online News Act into C-11. Netflix has no desire to compete with regional journalism, and shouldn’t be compelled to pay into a sector that it has no activity in." The bill originally contained a clause, Section 4(1), which explicitly excluded programs that are uploaded by users of social media platforms, who are not an owner, operator, or affiliate of the platform, as well as any online undertakings that consist only of such content, from the scope of the Broadcasting Act.

openmedia.org
  • What’s wrong with Bill C-11? An FAQ | OpenMedia

    Under Bill C-11, streaming companies like Netflix will also be forced to pay to produce CanCon - but will be ineligible to receive funding from the Canadian Media Fund, even when producing Canadian content.

cdec-cdce.org
  • Bill C-11 on broadcasting: frequently asked questions – CDCE

    No! Most experts agree that C-11 respects entirely Canadian Internet users’ liberty of expression for there are several articles in the bill that protect this fundamental right – which is also protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights ...

  • Why support Bill C-11? – CDCE

    ... Culture in Canada is a sector ... extraction, oil and gas, utilities and automotive · Culture GDP exceeded $57 billion in 2019, or 2.7% of Canadian GDP....

learnliberty.org
parl.ca
cbc.ca
lexpert.ca
openparliament.ca
  • Bill C-11 (Historical) | openparliament.ca

    No regulation of the internet: The Liberal speakers emphasized that Bill C-11 would not regulate the internet or control what Canadians view online, but rather regulate foreign streaming companies and domestic ones.

blg.com
mssolutions.ca

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact