This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate
This fact check is over 4 months old. The situation may have changed significantly — please recheck before relying on it.

Kekemelik Genetik ve Nörolojik Faktörlerle İlgili mi?

“Kekemelik sadece “heyecan” ya da “alışkanlık” değildir — DNA’mızda izler taşıyan nörolojik bir konuşma farklılığıdır. Bazı genetik analizler, dünya çapında 1 milyondan fazla kişinin genetik verisini incelemiş ve 57 ayrı genom bölgesi ile çok sayıda genin kekemelikle ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu genetik işaretler yalnızca konuşmanın motor kontrolüyle değil, aynı zamanda beyin ritmi, zamanlama, motor planlama ve duygu düzenleme gibi nörolojik süreçlerle de bağlantılıdır. Bu nedenle kekemelik tek bir genle değil, birden fazla genin birlikte etkisiyle şekillenir. Bu bulgular kekemeliğin biyolojik temelini ortaya koyarken, bireysel suçlama ve damgalamayı azaltmaya da katkı sağlamaktadır.”
Mostly true
Confidence: High Checked on April 26, 2026

Summary

Stuttering is recognized as a neurological speech difference with genetic underpinnings, not merely excitement or habit. Large‑scale genome‑wide studies involving close to a million participants have identified 57 distinct genomic loci affecting dozens of genes, many of which relate to motor control, timing, planning and emotional regulation. Consequently, stuttering results from the combined effect of multiple genes rather than a single genetic cause.

Recheck this fact Runs a fresh check with up-to-date sources

Sources 58 searched

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
science.org
nature.com
  • Large-scale genome-wide analyses of stuttering | Nature Genetics

    Our GWAS of self-reported stuttering in males and females is the largest to date, comprising nearly 100,000 cases and over one million controls. Although some complex traits with differences in prevalence by sex or ancestry show similar genetic architectures across these groups79,80, we found that there are both shared and distinct genetic effects impacting stuttering risk within sex and/or ancestry groups. Our primary GWAS and secondary meta-analyses identified 57 distinct signals (mapping to 48 unique genes), none of which have been previously reported in stuttering literature.

  • De novo protein-coding gene variants in developmental stuttering | Molecular Psychiatry

    Rare variant screens using linkage analysis followed by Sanger sequencing, and more recently using next generation sequencing, identified six genes to be associated with persistent stuttering in large families: GNPTAB [9], AP4E1 [10], IFNAR1 [11], ARMC3 [12], ZBTB20 [13] and PPID [14]. Hypothesis-driven genetic screens in unrelated people who stutter and controls also suggested an increased burden of rare variants in GNPTG and NAGPA, two genes that function in the same enzymatic pathway as GNPTAB [9, 15]. In addition, three genome-wide association studies identified the first genome-wide significant loci associated with stuttering [16,17,18], indicating that this is a genetically complex multifactorial trait for at least some of the affected population.

sciencedirect.com
  • Population-based genetic effects for developmental stuttering - ScienceDirect

    Meta-analysis of these genome-wide association studies identified a genome-wide significant (GWS) signal for clinically reported developmental stuttering in the general population: a protective variant in the intronic or genic upstream region of SSUH2 (rs113284510, protective allele frequency = 7.49%, Z = −5.576, p = 2.46 × 10−8) that acts as an expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) in esophagus-muscularis tissue by reducing its gene expression. In addition, we identified 15 loci reaching suggestive significance (p < 5 × 10−6). This foundational population-based genetic study of a common speech disorder reports the findings of a clinically ascertained study of developmental stuttering and highlights the need for further research.

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact