Linux is more expensive than Apple now – False

And the market share row understates Apple’s actual momentum: StatCounter’s worldwide desktop figures for July 2026 put Windows at 71.18% and Linux at 7.53%, with Apple’s totals split across “macOS” and “OS X” labels in StatCounter’s ...

Developers have the most polarized macOS vs Windows preferences, and 2026 hasn’t reduced the noise. The case for each platform: POSIX-native shell, Homebrew, native Bash/Zsh – closest desktop to a production Linux server without leaving the host OS · Required for iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, visionOS, and macOS development; Xcode runs nowhere else · Apple Silicon’s per-core throughput plus unified memory makes large Node, Python, and Rust workloads finish faster than equivalently priced Windows laptops in many tests

Apple’s revenue share of the PC market is disproportionate: at 12% of units, Apple captures roughly 28% of global PC revenue because its average selling price exceeds $1,600 vs $800 for Windows laptops. Developer adoption has shifted dramatically. The Stack Overflow 2025 Developer Survey showed 44% of professional developers now use macOS as their primary development OS, up from 30% in 2021, while Windows fell to 47% and Linux held at 9%. For software engineers specifically, Apple Silicon Macs are now the plurality device. See our AMD vs Intel 2026 comparison for the x86 side of this story.

For smartphones and other mobile ... and Apple's iOS has 28%. For desktop computers and laptops, Microsoft Windows has 62.16%, followed by unknown operating systems at 18.75%, Mac OS at 14.58%, desktop Linux at 3.09%, then Google's ChromeOS at 1.42%, as of June 2026...

In particular, it claimed that the vulnerabilities of Windows are fewer in number than those of Linux distributions, that Windows is more reliable and secure than Linux, that the total cost of ownership of Linux is higher (due to complexity, acquisition costs, and support costs), that use of ...

For many developers, the real 2026 ... assistants. Total cost in 2026 is less about the sticker price of the operating system and more about hardware, upgrades, software subscriptions, repairs, and how long the machine remains useful....

Linux is 1–5% faster than Windows on identical hardware and costs $810 total over 3 years for production servers. The M5 generation closed the speed gap between Apple Silicon and discrete GPUs significantly.

If you choose carefully, you get a small Linux desktop that feels far more refined than its secondhand price suggests. The reason this works at all is Asahi Linux. Apple did not design the M1 Mac mini as an open Linux platform, and the hardware did not arrive with normal PC-style documentation for Linux developers.

LibreOffice is crude and harder to use than most any commercial Office Suite. If Linux Users spent less time fishing stuff out of dumpsters ad applied themselves to getting GOOD work done we’d all be better off. ... Actually, Windows is the best. But, an issue arises due to its license fee. Then Linux comes as a solution. But look for an article in the government of Germany that actually, migrating from Windows to Linux takes more money, more costly.