This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate
This fact check is over 5 months old. The situation may have changed significantly — please recheck before relying on it.

Does pressure and false evidence make suspects internalise guilt?

“Psychological research by Kassin similarly demonstrates that suspects may internalise guilt when subjected to pressure and false evidence.⁹”
Supported by research
Confidence: High Checked on March 23, 2026

Summary

Kassin’s experimental work shows that presenting suspects with false evidence leads a substantial majority—often 44 % to 65 % or more—to internalize guilt and even confess falsely, while internalization is rare (0‑12 %) without such pressure. This confirms that pressure and false evidence can cause suspects to adopt a false sense of guilt.

Recheck this fact Runs a fresh check with up-to-date sources

Sources 59 searched

sciencedirect.com
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  • False Confessions: An Integrative Review of the Phenomenon - PMC

    On that point, nearly 26% intended to confess even before they were interrogated, likewise undermining longtime presumptions among academics in this area that confession itself is counterintuitive (Kassin 2012). If a suspect believes confession is in one's best interest, such a rationale may be well founded if the suspect knows they are guilty.

  • The Science-Based Pathways to Understanding False Confessions and Wrongful Convictions - PMC

    As a part of the early development, Gudjonsson and MacKeith (1982) introduced the term “memory distrust syndrome” to describe the memory vulnerabilities and processes that produced internalized false confessions. Numerous case studies (Gudjonsson, 2003a, 2018), as well as experimental evidence (Kassin and Kiechel, 1996; Horselenberg et al., 2003; Van Bergen et al., 2008, 2009, 2010), have supported the crucial role of memory distrust in some cases of false confessions.

blogs.cornell.edu
web.williams.edu
  • The Lie, The Bluff, and False Confessions

    J. T. Perillo  S. M. Kassin (&) Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, ... Tankleff was convicted. Nineteen years later, his convic- tion was overturned and all charges were dismissed ... Elaad, 2010). Ironically, laboratory research suggests that · mock interrogators who presume a suspect guilty conduct · particularly pressure-filled interrogations when paired with

  • 169 6 Internalized False Confessions Saul M. Kassin Williams College

    Misinformation revisited: New evidence · on suggestibility of memory. Memory and Cognition, 23, 72–82. Weinstein, E., Abrams, S., & Gibbons, D. (1970). The validity of the polygraph with hypnotically · induced repression and guilt. American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 1159–1162. Wright, L. (1994). Remembering Satan. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Wrightsman, L. S., & Kassin, S.

  • The Social Psychology of False Confessions

    Effects of actual innocence. On the basis of anecdotal evidence suggesting · that innocent people think and behave differently from guilty suspects in an in- terrogation setting, Kassin (2005) proposed that innocence itself could be a risk

saulkassin.org
  • Inside Interrogation: The Lie, The Bluff, and False Confessions

    Innocent but proven guilty: Using · false video evidence to elicit false confessions and create false · beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 624–637. doi:10.1002/ ... Redlich, A. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2003). Taking responsibility for · an act not committed: Influence of age and suggestibility. Law · and Human Behavior, 27, 141–156. doi:10.1023/A:10225430 ... Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S.

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact