Is https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jii/4750978.0006.301 reliable
Question asked:
“The website https://quod.lib.umich.edu/j/jii/4750978.0006.301?rgn=main;view=fulltext is a reliable source.”
Summary
The domain belongs to the University of Michigan Library’s digital collections, which are managed by the university’s reputable academic and research units. It hosts digitized scholarly materials and is widely used by scholars, indicating a high level of credibility.
Sources 57 searched
- Online Michigan History Resources
Michigan County histories: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/micounty/ Michigan Oral History Database Portal: https://www.database.michiganoha.org/index.php · Michigan Pioneer and Historical Collections: https://libguides.lib.msu.edu/c.php?g=95889&p=624851 ... The Newberry Library - Michigan: Atlas of Historical County Boundaries: https://digital.newberry.org/ahcb/pages/Michigan.html
- Home page | Digital Collections A-Z List
APIS, funded in part by the National Endowment for the Humanities, grew from the digitization of papyrus collections from a consortium of universities, including Columbia, Duke, Yale, and Michigan in the early ‘90s, overseen by the American Society of Papyrologists. ... The African American and African Diaspora Collection is comprised of individual letters, documents, and other manuscript items from the William L. Clements Library relating to slavery, abolition movements, and various aspects of African American life, largely dating between 1781 and 1865.
- Digital Libraries and the Need for a Universal Digital Publication Format
For more information, read Michigan Publishing's access and usage policy. This paper was refereed by the Journal of Electronic Publishing's peer reviewers. Reports have revealed low uses of e-books and other lengthy texts held in digital libraries.
- 12: Credibility and Effectiveness in Context: An Exploration of the Importance of Faculty Status for Faculty Developers
The data has its origins in an initial survey of faculty developers invited to participate through the listserv of the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (POD). In a five-day period in late December 2004, 31 faculty developers responded to a 16-question ...