This tool is donation based and free. 🙏 We're looking for donations to keep it running — $360/year covers our server costs.

$18 of $360 · 5%
Donate
This fact check is over a month old. Newer information may be available — consider rechecking.

What Was the Purpose of the Buck Act of 1935

“wae the purpose of the Buck Act of 1935?”
Tax federal employees
Confidence: High Checked on July 7, 2026

Summary

The Buck Act of 1935 was enacted to remove the immunity of federal officers and employees from state and local taxation, allowing states to tax their income and extend tax jurisdiction over federal areas. Its limited purpose was to ensure that federal employees residing or working in federal enclaves are subject to state tax obligations.

Recheck this fact Runs a fresh check with up-to-date sources

Sources 80 searched

justice.gov
irs.gov
app.leg.wa.gov
  • RCW 82.52.010:

    The state hereby accepts jurisdiction over all federal areas located within its exterior boundaries to the extent that the power and authority to levy and collect taxes therein is granted by that certain act of the 76th congress of the United States, approved by the president on October 9, 1940, and entitled: "An Act to permit the states to extend their sales, use, and income taxes to persons residing or carrying on business, or to transactions occurring, in federal areas, and for other purposes."

govinfo.gov
investor.gov
  • Registro bajo la Ley de Valores de 1933 | Investor.gov

    De hecho, todos los años la SEC entabla acciones de aplicación de la ley contra compañías que han omitido proveer información importante a los inversionistas. Aquellos inversionistas que compran valores y sufren pérdidas deberán saber que tienen derechos importantes en materia de recuperación si pueden demostrar que la divulgación de información fue incompleta o imprecisa.

law.cornell.edu
educatedinlaw.org
  • The Buck Act and other articles by Richard: McDonald – Educated in Law

    Again, I must refer you to Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404 (1935), 80 L.Ed. 299, 56 S.Ct. 252, 102 ALR 54. The Supreme Court of the United States of America always states the truth in their opinions. In the Madden case, it is telling you that, as a State Citizen, you have natural sovereign rights which are fundamental.

repository.law.umich.edu
  • Michigan Law Review Michigan Law Review Volume 51 Issue 6 1953

    rectify an inequality arising under the Public Salaries Act.16 This act removed · the immunity of federal employees from state and local taxation. However, a · state was still unable to tax a federal employee residing within a federal area · of exclusive jurisdiction. Thus, the income of a federal employee residing in a · federal area was not taxable by the state, while the income of his fellow employee · residing elsewhere was taxable. The Buck Act, by removing the immunity of

This fact check is free and donation-based. $1 powers ~30 fact-checks.

Donate $1 to support fact-checking

Check another fact